Activity Stream

Activity Stream

  1. Monique added a post in a topic Anyone NOT want cell towers in yards for any reason? 90+ Ohio lawsuits against bill that allows this.   

    Long Islanders Sue Over Health Concerns About New Cellphone Towers: “Long Island residents are raising health concerns as cellphone transmission equipment continues to be installedin many areas. As they joined hands in front of the courthouse, worried homeowners said the law must be changed to stop the new towers from being allowed. “This is an issue that is critical — not just to all of Long Island, but all of the United States,” said plaintiffs’ attorney Andrew Campanelli, “because across the United States, no wireless facilities are being tested.” http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2017/10/19/long-island-cellphone-towers-lawsuit/ http://longisland.news12.com/story/36637952/homeowners-file-lawsuit-over-potential-wireless-transmitter-health-risks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3VqliGwJsI&list=PLQ01KlFuvNZZfIz75U47EyqSM0es6BRNu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TTvS3-8ZtA
    • 0
  2. Monique added a post in a topic 90 Ohio lawsuits against senate bill which allows cell towers in residential yards, etc.   

    Long Islanders Sue Over Health Concerns About New Cellphone Towers: “Long Island residents are raising health concerns as cellphone transmission equipment continues to be installedin many areas. As they joined hands in front of the courthouse, worried homeowners said the law must be changed to stop the new towers from being allowed. “This is an issue that is critical — not just to all of Long Island, but all of the United States,” said plaintiffs’ attorney Andrew Campanelli, “because across the United States, no wireless facilities are being tested.” http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2017/10/19/long-island-cellphone-towers-lawsuit/ http://longisland.news12.com/story/36637952/homeowners-file-lawsuit-over-potential-wireless-transmitter-health-risks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3VqliGwJsI&list=PLQ01KlFuvNZZfIz75U47EyqSM0es6BRNu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TTvS3-8ZtA
    • 0
  3. WWWarrior added a post in a topic Winton Woods Football 2017   

    Winton Woods upped their season record to 8 wins, 1 loss with 42-7 thrashing of St. Francis DeSales (Columbus).   Looking for details, but alas.....unless you are a GCL South team or located in Anderson Twsp. the Enquirer doesn't cover you.(Oh, and Anderson got beat by previously unheralded Milford....Anderson playing a very weak schedule is catching up with them).
    The Warrior end their regular season at HOME with a match up with GCL South Archbishop Moeller.   Should be quite a game and might be  key in the Warriors Region 8 playoff position given Anderson's loss.
    • 0
  4. thecoles added a topic in Concerts and shows   

    THIS FOO'S FOR YOU, MIKE FARRAR. HAPPY BIRTHDAY
    Seeing the FooFighters 2nite, in memory of Mike Farrar, his favorite "new band". And on his birthday? I guess Mike just aligned the stars that way. Got a hookup for backstage and will do my best to get a dedication to you for "Everlong", your fav.  Happy Birthday, Mike.  Miss you every day.  These hills aren't as "green" without you.
    Chris Cole
    • 0 replies
    • 14 views
  5. Edling added a post in a topic Whiplash   

    I've only just recently seen Whiplash. Great movie. No wonder it was nominated for Oscars and stuff that year.
    • 0
  6. WWWarrior added a post in a topic Winton Woods Football 2017   

    Unfortunate Homecoming loss for the Warriors on October 13th.   Elder and Winton Woods were tied 28-28 at the end of regulation.  In a "sudden death" overtime, Elder was first to score making it 35-28.  Winton Woods then scored to make it 35-34 but the extra point hooked left and hit the upright with a sickening thud.  Final, 35-34.
    Remaining two regular season games for Winton Woods:
    October 20th AWAY at St. Francis De Sales (Columbus)
    October 27th HOME  Moeller
    • 0
  7. Monique added a post in a topic Anyone NOT want cell towers in yards for any reason? 90+ Ohio lawsuits against bill that allows this.   

     
    Big Congratulations to California residents: Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed their small cell bill which would have eliminated local authority in regard to cell tower/wireless infrastructure placement.
    In Ohio, our small cell tower bill passed last December when a wireless clause was added at the last minute to SB 331 “The Petland Bill”.  At least 90 Ohio municipal governments have filed lawsuits against it including Cincinnati, Mason, and Sharonville. As far as I know, there has been no local news coverage of this.  
    http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/16/california-gov-jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-easing-permits-on-cell-phone-towers/

     
     
     
     
    • 0
  8. Monique added a post in a topic 90 Ohio lawsuits against senate bill which allows cell towers in residential yards, etc.   

    Big Congratulations to California residents: Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed their small cell bill which would have eliminated local authority in regard to cell tower/wireless infrastructure placement.
    In Ohio, our small cell tower bill passed last December when a wireless clause was added at the last minute to SB 331 “The Petland Bill”.  At least 90 Ohio municipal governments have filed lawsuits against it including Cincinnati, Mason, and Sharonville. As far as I know, there has been no local news coverage of this.  
    http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/16/california-gov-jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-easing-permits-on-cell-phone-towers/
    http://emfsafetynetwork.org/sb-649-vetoed/
     
    • 0
  9. Monique added a topic in Politics   

    CA Govenor vetos state bill eliminating local authority in small cell tower placement. Ohio's bill still in effect despite 90 municipal govt lawsuits
    Big Congratulations to California residents: Last night Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed their small cell bill which would have eliminated local authority in regard to cell tower/wireless infrastructure placement.   In Ohio, our small cell tower bill passed last December when a wireless clause was added at the last minute to SB 331 (“The Petland Bill”).  At least 90 Ohio municipal governments have filed lawsuits against it including Cincinnati, Mason, and Sharonville. As far as I know, there has been no local news coverage of this.  
    http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/16/california-gov-jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-easing-permits-on-cell-phone-towers/
    http://emfsafetynetwork.org/sb-649-vetoed/ 
     
     
     
    • 0 replies
    • 8 views
  10. Ligorio Loonie added a topic in Local Events   

    Art for homeschool families 10/17
    Join the Contemporary Arts Center for a special workshop designed specifically for homeschool families. Stop by the Green Hills Library to participate in hands-on art making, learn about contemporary artists and take home an extended learning sheet with tips and resources for building on what you've discovered. This program is designed for children ages 6-12 and their parent or caregiver. Space is limited. Contact the Green Hills Library for registration. 
    Tuesday, October 17, 2017, 10:30 AM - 11:30 AM
    http://www.contemporaryartscenter.org/calendar/2017/10/17/cac-homeschool-at-green-hills-library
    • 0 replies
    • 29 views
  11. Monique added a post in a topic Anyone NOT want cell towers in yards for any reason? 90+ Ohio lawsuits against bill that allows this.   

    Dear Mr. Blight - thanks for posting this.  There are many resources online with similar information. 
    There are also many groups outside of Cincinnati also that have pre-written speeches available for free online - especially in regard to fighting cell towers on school properties and replacing WiFi with wired internet.  Some include: Citizens for Safe Technology, Parents for Safer Technology, Safe Tech for Schools Maryland, and National Association for Children and Safe Technology.
    Change happens where people are fighting for their communities:   In 2014, Greenbelt, MD council votes unanimously to alert citizens to the health risks of cell phone/wireless radiation and to oppose cell towers on school grounds.  http://ehtrust.org/maryland-city-votes-unanimously-alert-citizens-health-risks-cell-phonewireless-radiation-oppose-cell-towers-school-grounds/
    NopeCincy.org is a great local example of people fighting for their community and affecting change. 
    The UC professor I spoke with last year at the council meeting told me that usually the most accurate research is independently funded and peer reviewed.  Government research is good too.    
    For those who prefer video presentations, there are documentaries available online as well in re EMF/EMF/MW/RF emitting sources.  They feature interviews with doctors, scientists, and more: “Generation Zapped", “Wi-Fried”, "Mobilize", and "Take Back Your Power” 
    You are a great writer.  Most of this information has already been provided to local media by me as well as others.  If you are concerned, I hope you will consider submitting something as well.  There is strength in numbers.
    Have a Blessed Day.
     
    • 0
  12. Monique added a post in a topic Anyone NOT want cell towers in yards for any reason? 90+ Ohio lawsuits against bill that allows this.   

    Dear Mr. Blight - thank you for your response and your interest.  I already spoke at a Greenhills Village Council meeting last November along with a UC College of Medicine Environmental Health professor regarding all of the information I presented here and more.  I included research, etc. in regard to other EMF/EMF/RF/MW sources other than cell towers, WiFi Hotspots, and routers.   
    I received word back in January that they did not plan to do anything because of existing laws. 
    Since speaking at the meeting, I have been contacting the city manager every week or so to ask if any wireless infrastructure applications have been submitted within the village.  So far none have been submitted.  However more of them have been installed outside the village so it's only a matter of time before it could happen here.  www.antennasearch.com is a good resource.  At the same time, Antennasearch.com doesn't seem to always post everything that gets installed b/c many don't seem to get registered.  Locations for WiFi stations or "hotspots" can be found on other websites.  
    I have been sending The Law Committee updated information since November regarding new and proposed legislation, research, etc.  It is my understanding that they review it but other than that I cannot speak for them as to what they plan to do.  As far as I know, they did not file a lawsuit against the against the wireless clause in Senate Bill 331 along with the other 90 Ohio municipal governments - though I did provide information on how they could file with a Columbus law firm at a sliding scale ($2000).
    I also stopped in for about 10 minutes at The Law Committee meeting in August and presented some information in person.  I cannot speak on behalf of them as to what they plan to do with it.
    Before I started posting on this board, I posted for a few months on the Facebook page, "Concerned Citizens of Greenhills".   Although I received no hostile remarks, so far it seems that no one is still ready to act on it.  My Facebook name is "Mo Songs" because I am a songwriter.
    I have used examples of activism in re cell towers, etc. in Greenbelt, MD (another Greenbelt community) and many other communities on this board and on Facebook.  When people stand together, change happens.  I have been doing the best that I can by myself but without more people involved, it is unlikely that anything here will change.  I am more than happy to be a resource as well as stand with a group on this.
    I am aware of the tower on Sharon Road.  When my husband and I decided to move here, we made sure that we chose a home down the hill from it because of our concerns.  Because of existing laws I don't know that it can be removed.  However if residents in that neighborhood are concerned, they may want to address council about FCC procedures to make sure that it is within the current federal safety guidelines.  If it is not, then they need to make sure that is corrected. 
    I am really hoping that there will be no installation of any wireless infrastructure at the school buildings within the village.  That is also something that I discussed at the council meeting.  My husband and I do not have children but I have dropped off literature at the school down the street and talked to a few staff members about why I was leaving it with them.  I cannot say what they plan to do with this information.  I have also spoken to pretty much everyone I know locally (meaning outside of Greenhills) about what I have posted here and provided them with information for almost 2 years now.  No one so far seems to be willing to act on this. 
    There are a few other concerned citizens within the Greater Cincinnati.  They've also been trying to raise awareness and get others involved.  What can I say other than we need more than a few concerned citizens to affect change.
    Every media outlet in town has been provided with this information presented here and more.  They seem to be waiting for more people to call and complain before they will do a story.
    If you find some folks willing to act on any of this, please let me know.  Thanks again. 
     
     
     
     
    • 0
  13. ligoriolivin added a post in a topic New Village Construction   

    I am cautiously optimistic, we bought our home about 25 years ago, and the combination of abysmal school district and shopping center decay has resulted in virtually no increase in value in all those years.  I am not saying increased property values are all we should be concerned about.  Quality of life and such are more important, but property value is a measurable (if flawed) metric for how "nice" a neighborhood is. 
    My biggest fear, which is only somewhat related to this development, is the great increase in rental properties in the Village.  You can drive down the streets, and with almost 100% accuracy point to the houses that are rentals.  With no "skin in the game" the yards are un-kept, there are dilapidated vehicles in the drive, and bed sheets or even aluminum foil over the windows for drapes, gutters and shutters falling off.  Hopefully any redevelopment will bring interest in purchasing that might spill over to some of these currently rented properties.
    • 0
  14. Blight Reporter added a post in a topic Anyone NOT want cell towers in yards for any reason? 90+ Ohio lawsuits against bill that allows this.   

    Ms. Monique, it appears that you are very astute when it comes to fact-finding. Many of the documents you have shared with the community at large are very well thought out and provide just that hint of educational awareness that we all need to take into account without going through an entire dissertation leaving others, like Edge or Lord Voldermort (two other personalities on this site) completely lost.
    I would go so far as to tell you that your inclusion on this site is very welcomed. Others on this site, like Lovin' Ligorio, like to joke around and poke fun of others and, personally, I find it to harbor bad relations amongst our community.
    I would suggest that you take the much information gained from your research and request to make this a topic of discussion in front of your Greenhills Council members. As you may or may not be aware, there is a cell tower located on Sharon Rd. near the corner of Winton Rd. that backs up to many homes (where children play and reside). Risk to children you say? I say, to kids in YOUR (new) community. This tower could harbor, from the information you've been able to bring forth to the discussion could be a risk to those children and families.
    The more I think about it, because of your background and research in this topic, I'm beginning to believe that it is your civic duty/responsibility to inform the Greenhills Council to insure that NO cell towers remain around the village. Perhaps, the long-lasting effects and damages to people surrounding these towers is far more an important issue than anyone else has considered.
    Your data is beginning to sway me as to what M own personal safety could be. I'm going to grab a copy of my agreements and take a look to see what can be done.
    Thanks for all of your hard work and due diligence in this topic. There is much work to be done.
     
    • 0
  15. 4xeverything added a topic in Neighborhood news   

    New Village Construction
    I was hoping to be able to add a photo of the front page of the Greenhills Journal, but I still haven't figured out how to do that. So, what are your thoughts on the newly proposed "home development" on Greenhills owned properties?
    I, for one, am excited, and I cannot wait for the new development to begin. I live next door to one of the proposed sites, which (as an abandoned apartment building) has become a haven for drug users, and teenagers who want to hideout from police officers, after curfew. I have been subject to verbal assaults,  and my property has been burglarized (granted, there may not have been a relation between the burglary and verbal assaults), but assuming that one is seperate from the other would be remiss.  
    I'm on the fence about the design of the modern proposed homes, but anything that would raise my property value, with a "hopeful" influx of homeowners peaks my interest.
    Your thoughts..?
    • 1 reply
    • 82 views
  16. Monique added a post in a topic Anyone NOT want cell towers in yards for any reason? 90+ Ohio lawsuits against bill that allows this.   

    Dear Mr. Blight –
    You seem to be creative and intelligent person.  Given the times and current state of the world, it’s good to hear that others on this site consider you to be normal and seem to be benefiting from your gifts, etc. 
    Our friendly exchange gives me the opportunity to provide more links to those who may be considering cell tower and/or antenna placement on his/her property.
    In regard to wildlife, these are links to research provided by U.S. government employees:
    US Dept of Interior Letter warning regarding migratory birds and cell towers:   http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/us_doi_comments.pdf
    US Fish & Wildlife Study warning Non Ionizing Radiation http://ehtrust.org/memorandum-bird-wildlife-impacts-non-ionizing-radiation-albert-m-manville-ph-d-former-u-s-fish-wildlife-service-senior-biologist/
    This New York Times article provides more U.S. government research and also reports all kinds of internal drama within the CDC in regard to this research:  “At CDC, a Debate Behind Recommendations on Cellphone Risk.”  https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/02/technology/at-cdc-a-debate-behind-recommendations-on-cellphone-risk.html?_r=0
    In a nutshell – just weeks prior to the article being released, The CDC recanted the “bold” position it made against the dangers of cell phone radiation.  At the same time, the former director of CDC division, The National Center for Environmental Health, Dr. Christopher J. Portier would not recant his position.
    Dr. Portier also served on the International Agency for Research of Cancer, a branch of the World Health Organization that in May 2011 called low-frequency radiation from cellphones and other devices a possible carcinogen.   He said the I.A.R.C. declaration led him to seek a review of the CDC guidelines.  http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/05/31/who.cell.phones/
    Drama indeed.
    Also in regard to the The New York Time’s article…“An investigative report published by the Environmental Health Trust (EHT) digs deeper into the circumstances surrounding the CDC's retraction of their guidelines on cell phone radiation exposure.  The report, based on 500 pages of internal CDC documents released through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), illuminates key information left of out the New York Times article… that immediately after publishing the new guidelines in June 2014 the CDC hired Kenneth Foster … who has an established record of conducting research funded by the private wireless industry and has authored a number of studies with results that contradict the notion that children are more susceptible to cell phone radiation than adults.” http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/2986953/radiating_corruption_the_frightening_science_and_politics_of_cell_phone_safety.html
    Other unfortunate research revealed in The Ecologist’s article:
    Cell phone use linked with erectile dysfunction.
    L
    All this being said, I don’t think it’s unreasonable for my husband and me to not want cell tower infrastructure in front of our home or anywhere near us.  There also seems to be no issue with cell phone reception in our neighborhood and wireless infrastructure has been proven to lower property value. 
    On a side note - my husband and I moved to Greenhills about a year ago.  We’ve been very surprised to see so many large branches falling from trees all over our neighborhood.  At least one tree had to be cut down because it was dying.  I asked a neighbor if this was normal or if this was a new issue.  He has lived here a long time and said it was a new issue.  Sad.
    Thank you for your contribution to this thread and also sharing information about FCC measurement procedures.  It’s a shame that FCC employees are having difficulty getting good readings on your property.  Then again I've never heard of them using actual tape measures.  Perhaps you should look into that.
    Have a blessed day.
     
    • 0
  17. Monique added a post in a topic Anyone NOT want cell towers in yards for any reason? 90+ Ohio lawsuits against bill that allows this.   

    Blight Reporter - Glad it's working out well for you but it seems you may have a different situation (and more property) than many home owners. 
    The Ohio bill (and the federal bills still being discussed) provide no income for residential home owners when small cell tower infrastructure is placed in front of their homes.  Municipal governments aren't getting much income out of it either.  The March 20, 2017 Cleveland press conference (with the mayors and law directors of Cleveland and Independence) provides details of why so many municipal governments filed lawsuits against this.     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWE8EC-bqEI
    I've provided many other links from different Ohio municipal governments also in previous posts which also identify issues and concerns.  There are at least 90 who have filed lawsuits. 
    This being said - I've already checked it out thoroughly.  If firefighters don't want it on their properties, I certainly don't want it on mine or anywhere nearby. http://fearlessparent.org/cell-tower-hypocrisy-rescuing-firefighters-not-kids/
    I've also talked to many of my neighbors and there are no complaints about our cell phone service here. 
    A few weeks ago Judge Ethna Cooper of Hamilton County ruled that the wireless clause in the Ohio Bill 331 violated the state constitution.  As far as I know, this hasn't been covered by our local press.  In other parts of Ohio, judges have also ruled that the clause is unconstitutional but unfortunately the judgment was then overturned.  I provided links for this happening in Summit County on previous posts.
    Since you have rented space to cell towers on your property, it would be great if you'd provide details on how often the Federal Communications Commission comes and measures the towers to make sure they are not violating federal RF regulations.  I already asked this of someone else on this list who rents to cell towers and he has yet to provide answers.
    According to a 2014 Wall Street Journal - 1 in 10 cell towers violates federal regulations and there aren't enough employees to make sure this is corrected in many instances.  www.rfsafe.com/wsj-one-10-cell-phone-towers-violate-rf-radiation-safety-rule
    Again - I stand with firefighters and the 90 Ohio municipal governments who don't want this.   Thanks for your interest and your contribution to this post.  I hope you will provide more.
     
     
     
       
     
     
     
     
     
     
    • 0
  18. Blight Reporter added a post in a topic Harvest Fest This Sarurday   

    I was fortunate to have been able to attend this year's event. Just some feedback for future Harvest Fests.
    1) For the Fire Department's fundraising efforts I dressed up like a fire hydrant. I then took my place as a parade volunteer to keep the pooches and people on the path for the parade. I was used as a potty throughout the entire parade. I didn't win, and a little girl named, Sally F., called me smelly and it hurt my feelings.
    2) I was harassed by a straw-man that was placed at a booth. The damn thing wouldn't stop staring at me.
    3) The apple pie I tasted was pretty good. But, it looked like it had been torn to pieces from the middle out.
    4) Tommy J. and little Billy H. beat me badly in laser tag. It was very disappointing that they didn't even pull the trigger. Rather, they allowed their Rottweiler to attack me viciously and once on the ground they pummeled me with their guns. Try pulling the trigger a couple of times first at least.
    Overall, it was a good time.
    • 0
  19. Blight Reporter added a post in a topic Anyone NOT want cell towers in yards for any reason? 90+ Ohio lawsuits against bill that allows this.   

    I really have no issue with cell towers being placed on people's residences. I have three of them on mine and have found that it opened up new avenues of monies.
    For instance, the first tower was erected at the height of 350'-0". I quickly ascertained that at this height I was able to allow the flock of peregrine falcons I teach to perch and nest, thus providing me more space on the ground for my radish garden.
    The second tower was erected several years after that. I had planned to grow grapes around the first one. But, after getting the soil tested in my yard it was found to be too acidic and not good soil for growing grapes. Therefore, because of the way the two towers were situated I was able to create a "hammock village". By tying off on tower supports and fashioning tarps across the structures I was able to create a spacial dimension of nearly 1000 square feet for the "hammock village". People now come to relax, watch the birds, and enjoy nature.
    The last tower was erected just two years ago. This tower, perhaps the most elegant of the three, rises 400'-0" above the ground. My hammock village has now grown into a covered area where I now host weddings, large get-togethers, and other outdoor oddities such as carnivalesque performances. For instance, last year I had the bearded man, and the two-breasted woman. Show stoppers they were.
    I would entertain more towers on my property. The cash flow has paid off for me, personally. Others entertaining towers on their property may not have the same financial prowess as myself and that is understood. Just don't knock the idea until you've checked it out first. 
    • 0
  20. WWWarrior added a post in a topic Winton Woods Football 2017   

    The Winton Woods Warriors are now 7-0 after traveling to Northeast Ohio and dismantling Canton Central Catholic 43-0..  CCC have been State Champs in Div. 4 and 5 in years past but were no match for this years version of WW football  (even after as someone put it "a 3 hour bus ride eating pizza and drinking fruit drink").  Hopefully that last part about the food served was just joking.
    Next week, October 13th, is Homecoming at Winton Woods, so there's a parade and the Warriors host the Elder Panthers (who are just coming off a win over Mighty Moeller).  In other news LaSalle got beat by St. X and Anderson just "sqweeked" a win over unranked West Clermont in a high scoring game.  I'm sure the Enquirer will still consider them ahead of Winton Woods in the standing even if the rest of the state doesn't.  My contempt for the way local media covers these kids continues to grow.
    • 0
  21. WWWarrior added a topic in Neighborhood news   

    Harvest Fest This Sarurday
    x

    It’s time for Harvest Fest!  Saturday, October 7th will be filled with family-friendly activities, vendors, music, food and fun. 

    Pooch Parade/costume contest & SPCA adoptions
    It all gets started at 10 a.m. with SPCA pet adoptions and a Pooch Parade! Judges will award paw-some prizes to some Pooch Parade participants!  Registration is only $5 per pooch, with a portion of the proceeds going towards the Greenhills Fire Department’s Canine program.  The SPCA pet adoptions will run from 10 a.m. until 1 p.m., in front of the Greenhills Swimming Pool. There will also be a number of pet-related booths as well as canine demonstrations at Harvest Fest. 
     
    Vendor Booths
    Vendor booths will open at 11 a.m.  There’s a great selection of booths this year, including arts & crafts, home goods, clothing and sweet treats. Be sure to stop by them all.
     
    Pie Baking Contest
    Also, the pie baking contest is returning this year!  All amateur bakers are encouraged to enter their best homemade pie.  Bring your pies to the festival beginning at 1 p.m. for entry.  Judges will begin sampling pies at 2 p.m., with awards to follow.  There is a $2 entry fee for each pie.
     
    More fun, food and music
    Hayrides, laser tag and pumpkin painting will be available from 1 to 6 p.m.  A $5 activity wristband will be available for all of these fun activities.  Be sure not to miss the American Legion Beer Garden, opening at 4 p.m. Balderdash will headline the evening, beginning at 5 p.m.  Harvest Fest wraps up at 9 p.m., so there’s plenty of time to play games, enjoy some food and drink and shop our wide variety of vendor booths.
     
    Bring the family to enjoy a fun fall day at the Harvest Fest!
    • 1 reply
    • 58 views
  22. WWWarrior added a post in a topic Winton Woods Football 2017   

    x
    Assoc. Press DIVISION II
    1. Avon (14)
    5-0
     222
    2. Cincinnati Winton Woods (10)
    5-0
     219
    3. Cincinnati Anderson
    5-0
     189
    4. Medina Highland
    5-0
     144
    5. Cincinnati La Salle
    4-1
     140
    6. Sidney
    5-0
     105
    7. Columbus Walnut Ridge
    5-0 
      66
    8. Wadsworth
    5-0
      58
    (tie) Cleveland Benedictine
    4-1
      58
    10. Grafton Midview
    4-1
      44
     
    Yappi.com Division II Poll

    1 Winton Woods (Cincinnati) (5-0) (199) [11]
    2 La Salle (Cincinnati) (4-1) (181) [1]
    3 Archbishop Hoban (Akron) (4-1) (165) [7]
    4 Avon (Avon) (5-0) (138) [1]
    5 Anderson (Cincinnati) (5-0) (121)
    6 Highland (Medina) (5-0) (102)
    7 Wadsworth (Wadsworth) (5-0) (96) [3]
    8 Barberton (Barberton) (5-0) (61)
    9 Massillon Washington (Massillon) (4-1) (60)
    10 Hudson (Hudson) (4-1) (50)

    Others - Benedictine (Cleveland) (4-1), Sidney (Sidney) (5-0), Sylvania Northview (Sylvania) (5-0), Walnut Ridge (Columbus) (5-0), Belmont (Dayton) (5-0)
    • 0
  23. WWWarrior added a post in a topic Hurricane Relief 9/22nd & 29th   

    BUMP AGAIN
    • 0